CALL US NOW AT (847) 665-9134
magnify

“The riches are in the niches.”

A common marketing mistake among small business owners is that they go after a market that is too broad.  They want to cast their net as wide as possible in the belief that it’s a numbers game . . . that the bigger the market, the more potential customers there are, and with more potential customers, the odds of snagging a few of those customers improves.  While that may be a reasonable line of thinking, it’s wrong.  The truth is, when you try to appeal to everyone, you end up appealing to no one.  You’re really better off identifying a niche you can serve . . . preferably one that’s “an inch wide and a mile deep.”  Your niche may be defined by an under-served geographic marketplace, or it may be defined by a particular area of expertise.  Either way, in a highly targeted niche, you have a chance to stand out and to have your message heard.  Not so if you try to attack an entire category where prospective customers won’t know who you are, what you’re trying to do, or who you’re trying to serve.  So why do small business owners resist pursuing a niche strategy?  To learn the answer, and to get some tips on how to identify and carve out your niche, please continue reading below.

“The riches are in the niches.”       ~ Unknown

Somebody may know who coined that phrase, but we don’t.  There are so many marketing articles and books written using that phrase, it’s difficult to pick out who started it.  It could be brand strategist Philip VanDusen, but we couldn’t find any confirmation of that.  So for now, it’s origin will remain one of life’s little mysteries.

Anyway, as to the question posed above, small business owners who resist a niche strategy do so simply because they believe that by casting themselves in a narrow niche, they will miss some opportunities.  While that’s an honestly-held fear, it’s an unfounded one.  In fact, if you’re a big fish in a little pond, you’ll be more likely to find those opportunities, or have those opportunities find you.

For many business people, deciding what niche to carve out is a significant problem.  We tell ourselves that we’re good at what we do, but we have to admit, our competitors are good too.  Our quality is top notch, but so is theirs.  We have great customer service, but they’re no slouches either.  Our pricing is very competitive, but they’re right there with us. So how do we make ourselves stand out?  What will cause our customers to select us rather than one of our competitors?  It’s a tough question.

A brand strategist we know tells us that most companies don’t know why their customers have chosen them over their competitors.  They think they know, but they’re really just guessing, and in the vast majority of cases, they’re guessing wrong.  So there’s a disconnect between what the company thinks it’s selling and what the customer thinks it’s buying.  In some cases, the disconnect is significant, in others it’s subtle, but it’s almost always there, and it’s in that disconnect that your niche lies.  There’s something you’re doing (or not doing) that your customers value.  Find out what that is, and you will have defined your niche.

An outdoor lighting company lights up the homes of the rich and famous.  Usually, the lighting company isn’t hired directly by the homeowner, but instead, works as a subcontractor to the homeowner’s landscaping company.  With annoying regularity, just before 5:00 p.m. on a Friday afternoon, the lighting company gets a panicked phone call from one of its landscapers who begs, “You gotta help me.  Mrs. Smith is having a big party and she wants her lighting up by Sunday.”  The lighting company’s owner accepts the challenge, much to the dismay of his employees whose weekend plans are now in tatters.  They complain to him, “Why do we work for these clowns who can’t ever get their act together . . . it’s always a last-minute scramble to bail them out of trouble.”  The company owner answers, “You don’t understand.  These clowns who can’t get their act together are our customers.  The landscapers who are all buttoned up and well-organized can get anybody to do their lighting work.  They don’t need us.  But when a landscaper gets things screwed up and needs someone who can perform at the last-minute, we’re the only game in town.”  So his niche is disorganized landscapers who regularly get themselves in a jam and need someone who can come in on short notice to save the day.

If you’re still struggling to find your niche and if your “unique selling proposition” is elusive, try asking your customers.  That’s right, ask your customers!  Offer to buy them a cup of coffee and ask this question:

“You don’t have to do business with us.  There are others you could have chosen to do business with, but you didn’t.  You chose us.  Why?”

You will probably be surprised by what you hear.  You may even find out that you’re not in the business you thought you were in.  Maybe you’re not in the outdoor lighting business at all.  Maybe your real calling is to save the butts of disorganized landscapers.

Peter Schutz, lecturer, writer, and former CEO of Porsche once said, “If you listen carefully, your customers will explain your business to you.”

He’s right.

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn

It’s lonely at the top, isn’t it?

You may be (or you are) the smartest guy in the room, but are you smarter than you plus everyone else in the room?  Collectively, your employees have more experience than you do, and because they’re immersed in the nitty-gritty details of daily operations, they know things about the business that you don’t.  They know where resources are being wasted and they know what’s working well and what’s not.  So doesn’t it make sense to harness that knowledge and experience when you’re faced with making difficult decisions and solving perplexing problems?  Still not sure recruiting the brain power of your workforce is a good idea?  Please continue reading below and we’ll try to convince you.

It’s lonely at the top, isn’t it?

It is if you’re trying make your company’s toughest decisions and solve its knottiest problems all by yourself.  Even if you’re leaning on your management team for help and support, you’re still ignoring a great, untapped resource: your employees.

So what’s in the way?  Why wouldn’t an owner or CEO want to get help when it’s so readily available?  Well, for one thing, seeking decision-making and problem-solving help, not just from the management team, but from people throughout the organization, is kind of a new idea that the CEO might not have even considered.  But there are other possible explanations:

  • Arrogance.  The CEO may not believe that the people who are running machinery and doing routine administrative chores are capable of creative thought.  He or she may think, “I’ve got an MBA and you want me to ask for help from people who may have spent a semester or two at a junior college . . . if that?  What could they possibly know that would be helpful?
  • Pride.  In many organizations, making the tough calls has always been the sole domain of the CEO.  So the CEO may be afraid that inviting others into that domain will be a sign of weakness.  And how’s it going to look if someone actually comes up with a good idea that the CEO hadn’t thought of?
  • Fear.   What happens if the employees get themselves locked onto a solution that the CEO believes is wrong and can’t support?  Will there be a palace revolt?

While these factors are real and must be overcome, the big stumbling block is culture change.  Most organizations today are still mired in a top-down management structure whereby most meaningful decisions and solutions are handled at the highest levels.  Of course, we depend upon the lower levels of the organization to implement decisions that are made at the top, even though the lower levels played no role in crafting those decisions.  That’s the part of the company’s culture that will have to change.  Top management must be more inclusive and open its decision-making and problem-solving processes to people throughout the organization.  For their part, the people being invited into the decision-making and problem-solving club must accept the responsibility and accountability that go along with club membership.  In addition, these newest club members may be expected to execute decisions, since they now have a hand in crafting them, with commitment and enthusiasm.

“The best ideas for improving a job come from those who do it every day.” ~ Jim Bleech, business consultant

Incidentally, in case the thought has crossed your mind, we’re not talking about turning your organization into a democracy.  We’re not advocating putting every decision you make to a vote.  As owner/CEO, final decisions are still yours to make and yours alone.  We think it makes sense to give your employees a voice in your decision-making and problem-solving processes . . . but not a vote.

Harnessing the brain power of your workforce doesn’t cost you anything.  You’re not adding anything to your payroll, so why squander a valuable resource that you’re already paying for?  Besides, as an added bonus, your people will feel good about themselves, about you, and about the company because you’re showing respect for their thoughts, ideas, and opinions.  You will have elevated them from mere employees to trusted colleagues and advisors.

How you bring about this change in culture will vary somewhat from organization to organization.  A large organization will likely do it a bit differently than a small one.  If you’re running a 3-shift operation, you will probably have some challenges that will not be faced by a nine-to-five operation.  Likewise, if you have multiple locations, you will face some difficulties not faced by companies with a single location.  Still, the culture change we’re suggesting here can be accomplished with any organization provided you’re committed to it.

If you think the notion of bringing more brain power into your decision-making and problem solving-processes has merit, but you’re unsure how to go about it, contact me . . . I’ll be glad to help.

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn

Don’t produce a budget. Map out a Profit Plan. (Part II)

The blog below is a repeat, as were the previous two postings (September 4, 2019 and September 18, 2019). Combined, the three postings offer a template for developing a 2020 Plan. We are re-publishing these now because developing an Annual Plan is a critically important activity for any small business to undertake, and now is the right time to do it. If you don’t remember seeing these before, perhaps they will encourage you to get serious about creating an Annual Plan. If you do remember them, then maybe they serve as a good refresher. Either way, plan well.

We have been talking about an annual planning process.  It began two postings ago when we talked about laying out three to five strategic initiatives aimed at moving the company forward.  Then with our last posting, we began a 2-part discussion on what some call a “budget,” but what we prefer to call a “profit plan.”  Part 1 dealt with the revenue side of things.  How do we forecast what we expect to sell next year?  Now we’ll deal with the cost side of things.  We need a spending plan that anticipates what we expect our costs to be next near.  If you’re interested in our discussion about projecting costs, please continue reading Profit Plan (Part II) below.

Don’t produce a budget.  Map out a Profit Plan. (Part II)

The basic problem we see with forecasting the cost side of the business is people trying to take shortcuts in the name of being expedient.  Most shortcuts create two problems:

  1. They can rob you of the level of detail you need to spot waste, inefficiency, or irregularities.
  2. If your Plan starts to falter, they can make it difficult to analyze what’s going wrong, and even more difficult to figure out how to fix it.

Here are a few examples of shortcuts you should not take.

Bad shortcut #1

Breaking down all our sales and expense projections by month is a real pain.  Can’t we make do with just the annual numbers?

Nope.  You’ll want to break down everything by month so that when your actual financial statements are available each month, you’ll be able to compare them to your Profit Plan.  If your Plan is made up of only annual numbers, you may not realize it’s off target until it’s too late in the year to do much about it.

Bad shortcut #2

We know what our overall Cost of Goods is as a percentage of sales.  Can’t we just use that instead of calculating a separate Cost of Goods for each of our products or service lines?

If you’ve got multiple products or service lines, each with its own unique Cost of Goods structure, you’ll need to know how much of each you expect to sell, and then do a separate Cost of Goods calculation on each.  Otherwise, if your Cost of Goods starts going out of whack, how will you know which of your products or service lines is the culprit?

Bad shortcut #3

Do we really have to analyze our fixed costs.  After all, they are “fixed,” right?  Can’t we just use last year’s costs as a percent of sales and go with that?

No, we can’t.  Our fixed costs (usually referred to as SG&A or Overhead) are “fixed” only in the sense that we have to pay them no matter what.  Even if we’re having a dismal sales month, we still have to pay salaries, utilities, bank debt, etc.  But these so-called “fixed” costs do change.  We may hire new office people or grant salary increases to existing employees, the lease agreement for our office space may have a rent escalation clause, some of our vendors might put through price increases, etc.  Besides, if we just base our spending on historical trends, we eliminate opportunities to improve . . . to eliminate waste and improve efficiency.

Throughout this process, for both revenue and expenses, you should be recording assumptions for each line item, i.e. “We plan to put in an across-the-board 5% price increase in April,” or “We expect our energy costs to be flat.”  During the year, as you compare your actual results to the results you expected in your Profit Plan, you’ll be looking for variances or deviations.  When you find them, if they are significant, you’ll ask yourself, “What the heck were we thinking when we forecast that number?”  If you recorded your assumptions properly, they will remind you what you were thinking.  If the assumption is flawed in some way, then you may have to make a correction to your Profit Plan.  But if the assumption still seems valid, then we apparently failed to execute on that particular item and we’ll need to find out if there’s some corrective action we can take to get back on track.

Now for the tough part.  You’ve projected your sales and expenses for next year, so now you can see your projected profit.  If that number meets your expectations, then good, we’re done.  But if not, you have a choice to make: you can either accept the profit level the Plan projects (even though it’s lower than what you expected); or you can go back to the Plan, tweeking it here and there to produce the profit result you want.  The danger here is that your sound business judgement gets replaced by hope and unreasonable optimism, and the tweeks you make are nothing more than wishful thinking.  Obviously, you want to avoid that.

In summary of this posting and the previous two postings:

  • Begin building your annual plan by laying out the three to five strategic initiatives you expect to implement to move the company forward during the coming year.
  • Forecast sales and expenses for the coming year to produce a Profit Plan, noting all the assumptions you make during that process.
  • As you set your strategic goals and build your Profit Plan, be as inclusive as possible.  The more people you are able to involve in the process, the more support you’ll have when the new year starts and it’s time to execute your plans.
  • Throughout the process, immerse yourself in the details of your business, and avoid shortcuts that may undermine your annual plan’s usefulness as a valuable management tool.
 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn

Don’t produce a budget. Map out a Profit Plan. (Part 1)

The blog below is a repeat, as was the previous posting (September 4, 2019), and as will be the next posting (October 2, 2019).  Combined, the three postings offer a template for developing a 2020  Plan.  We are re-publishing these now because developing an Annual Plan is a critically important activity for any small business to undertake, and now is the right time to do it.  If you don’t remember seeing these before, perhaps they will encourage you to get serious about creating an Annual Plan.  If you do remember them, then maybe they serve as a good refresher.  Either way, plan well.

In our last posting, we talked about building an annual plan around three to five strategic initiatives.  We also suggested that you open up your planning process to as many of your employees as possible . . . don’t restrict it to only you and your top managers.  Make your planning process as inclusive as you can.  However, these strategic initiatives are activity-based  . . . these are the things we’re going to be doing to move the company forward.  But the plan also needs a financial component.  It needs what many people call a budget, but what we prefer to call a “profit plan.”  A “budget” sounds restrictive, confining.  It sets the boundaries for what we can and cannot do.  A “profit plan” on the other hand, says “This is our target for profitability next year, and here’s how we intend to achieve it.”  The Profit Plan probably looks identical to a traditional budget, but instead of a document that sets up boundaries, it’s a road map to the financial outcomes we expect to achieve next year.  For a few thoughts on how to build your Profit Plan, please continue reading below.

Don’t produce a budget.  Map out a Profit Plan. (Part 1)

The starting point for a Profit Plan is also the most difficult part . . . that is, a sales projection for the year.  It’s difficult because in most cases, we don’t know with certainty who is going to buy from us, what they’re going to buy, or in what quantity they’re going to buy.  So it’s a lot of guesswork.  Educated guesswork perhaps, but guesswork nonetheless.  Still, we can’t have a Profit Plan without some sort of sales target.

The best, most reliable way to project sales is customer-by-customer.  If you’ve got thousands upon thousands of customers, this approach may not be practical, but for most small businesses, that’s not the case.  So take a look at each customer (probably with the help of your sales people) and ask yourself:

  • What did they buy from us last year?
  • Was there some event last year (one that won’t be repeated) that caused them to buy more or less from us than they normally would?
  • Do we have any intelligence that would suggest they’ll do more or less business with us the coming year than they did this year?  That is, are they trying to acquire other businesses, open new locations, roll out new products or services, etc.?
  • Thinking of our existing customer base, do we have opportunities to sell them more of what they’re already buying from us?  Do we have opportunities to sell them additional products or services that they are not currently buying from us?
  • How many new customers are in our sales funnel and how many of those can we reasonably expect to start doing business with us this year?  For each of those that we think will be new customers for us, when will they start and at what volume?
  • What about attrition?  Nobody keeps every customer forever . . . they retire, move away, close their doors, all sorts of stuff that may or may not have anything to do with us.  So how much business can we reasonably expect to fall off during the year?
  • Are we anticipating any change in our pricing strategy that may cause our volume to go up or down?
  • Do we expect the strategic goals (discussed in our previous post) to have an impact on sales.  If so, we need to build that into our projection.

Obviously, this is an exhaustive process, but one that forces us to closely examine our customers and understand their evolving needs.  It also takes our guesswork out of the realm of total speculation.  It’s still guesswork, but as noted earlier, it’s at least educated guesswork.

Some companies may try to avoid this customer-by-customer approach using some sort of trend analysis.  For instance, they may say, “Over the past three years, our sales have averaged an annual 10% increase, so we’ll just assume that trend will continue.”  While this approach is better than nothing, it doesn’t offer any insights into the dynamics of the company’s customer base or market segment.  But for some, it may be the only way to do it.  For instance, a divorce attorney may have a good referral network, but doesn’t really have a customer base that will produce reliable repeat business.  He or she can’t really count on the people who divorced last year, divorcing again this year.

At the risk of making this sales projection process even more burdensome, we need to footnote everything.  At some point in the year, it will become obvious that some of our assumptions are way off base.  We will say, “Wow!  ABC Company isn’t doing one tenth of the volume we expected it to do.  What we’re we thinking?”  It’s unlikely we’ll be able to remember what we were thinking when we came up with our projection for ABC Company, but if we footnoted why we projected what we did, we can determine whether or not there’s a way to get it back on track.  If not, we may have to revise our projection for that company. 

OK, so we’ve got the sales projection component of our Profit Plan complete, or at least our first swing at it.  In our next post, we’ll talk about the fixed and variable cost components of our Plan. 

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn

“The nicest thing about not planning is that failure always comes as a complete surprise and is not preceded by a period of worry and desperation.”

The blog below is a repeat.  It was first published two years ago, along with two companion pieces that will also be re-published in the two postings following this one.  Combined, the three postings offer a template for developing a 2020  Plan.  We are re-publishing these now because developing an Annual Plan is a critically important activity for any small business to undertake, and now is the right time to do it.  If you don’t remember seeing these before, perhaps they will encourage you to get serious about creating an Annual Plan.  If you do remember them, then maybe they serve as a good refresher.  Either way, plan well.

About this time every year . . . somewhere around the beginning of the 4th quarter . . . is a good time to begin planning for next year.  Unfortunately, planning is not an activity that most small businesses engage in . . . at least, not in any meaningful way.  The owner may have in mind some sales and profit targets, but no real plan for how to achieve them.  The prevailing attitude seems to be, “We’ll just work real hard and hope we get there.”  But as they say, hope is a poor strategy.  Or, as author and explorer Jeff Rich tells us, “A goal without a plan is just a wish.”  Yet planning does have its detractors.  Mike Tyson has famously said, “Everybody’s got a plan   . . . until they get punched in the mouth.”  And Woody Allen weighs in with, “If you want to make God laugh, tell him about your plans.”  So if you’re in the same camp as Mike and Woody, and believe that planning is a waste of time, you should stop reading here.  But if you’re willing to be convinced that putting together an annual plan just might have some merit, please continue reading below.

 “The nicest thing about not planning is that failure always comes as a complete surprise and is not preceded by a period of worry and desperation.”     ~ Richard Palmer

If you truly have no expectations or goals for next year and are content to take whatever results fate chooses to give you, then fine, don’t plan.  Under those circumstances, what would be the point?  But if you do have aspirations and goals for next year (and of course, you do), then to claim that you can achieve those without at least a rudimentary plan is indefensible.

To be honest, it’s amazing that there’s any resistance at all to planning in a small business.  After all, we do plan for all sorts of other stuff.  We plan for vacations.  We plan for weddings (ugh, down to the last napkin).  We use financial planners to help us plan our future.  Yet, even though a business is usually the owner’s largest asset, many still resist the idea of an annual plan.  Yeah, it takes time and it takes effort, but done correctly, the result is a roadmap for where you’re going and how you’re going to get there.

The first step is to identify the major strategic goals you want to achieve next year.  Set SMART goals . . . goals that are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Results-oriented, and Time-based. Vague goals that don’t include measurements or deadlines are doomed from the start.  Consider limiting yourself to three.  If you undertake more than three, you risk stretching yourself too thin.  It’s better to achieve the results you want with three goals than to achieve only so-so results with five.  And don’t set these goals all by yourself, locked away in your office.  Involve the managers on whom you will depend to implement these goals.  They probably have their own ideas about what the company should be undertaking next year, and you should hear those ideas.  Besides, they will be more supportive of goals they helped to set than they would be of goals in which they had no input.

Make sure your goals are focused on the outcomes or results that you expect.  For instance, “Buy and install a new computer system” is not a goal.  “Developing more detailed, timely business intelligence,” is a goal . . . it may be necessary to buy a new computer system to achieve this goal, but buying a new computer system is only the means to an end, not a goal.

Commit the goals to writing, taking care to word them clearly and concisely.  Confirm everyone has the same understanding of what we’re trying to achieve with each goal.

Next we have to do a little number crunching to make sure there’s an acceptable ROI for each goal.  That is, we need to identify a benefit to the company in terms of improved productivity, reduced cost, or higher profit.  If we can’t prove such a benefit (or if the benefit is significantly less than we hoped it would be), we either re-work the goal in a way that will achieve a better result, or we toss it out and substitute a different goal.

Now comes the hard part.

Each manager who has helped craft your goals must now present them to his or her direct reports and solicit their reactions/feedback.  Just as you needed your managers participation in the goal-setting process to secure their support, now you need the support of everyone else.  You can’t fake this.  You can’t go through the motions of being “inclusive” in this goal-setting process if you have no intention of listening to what anyone may have to say.  So you need to make an honest effort to get people to voice their questions, concerns, opinions, and suggestions.  We’re not running a democracy here, so you’re not obligated to act on what they say, but you are obligated to listen, to hear, and appreciate what they are telling you.  Besides, these are the folks who are immersed in the nitty-gritty details of your business every day, so it’s just possible they will spot something in your proposed goals that you and your managers overlooked.

Finally, we need to put metrics on each goal so they can be tracked and measured (remember the M in SMART goals?).  No question, some goals are easier to measure than others, but if a particular goal defies measurement of any kind, then it doesn’t really qualify as a goal.  After all, if we can’t measure it, we won’t know if or when we’ve achieved it. If you think all this planning stuff is a waste of time and would prefer to “just work real hard and hope for the best,” that’s your choice.  However, if building an annual plan makes sense to you but you haven’t done one before and don’t quite know where to start, email or call me.  I’ll be happy to help.

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn

“If you procrastinate when faced with a big difficult problem . . . break the problem into parts, and handle one part at a time.”

Dan Sullivan is the founder of The Strategic Coach, Inc. and the creator of The Strategic Coach Program . . . a program that helps already successful entrepreneurs become even more successful.  He is also the author of more than 30 publications including one entitled “WhoNotHow.”  In this particular publication, he teaches that procrastination is not about being lazy or unfocussed or overly cautious.  Even though most of us grew up believing that procrastination is a bad thing, Sullivan believes procrastination is actually our inner wisdom warning us that, while our goal may be a worthy one, we may not be the right one to achieve it.  As Sullivan says, “You come up with a new, better vision of what’s possible, but you don’t have the capability to pull it off . . . so you put it off.”  Taken in this light, procrastination is a valuable management tool that tells us when we need to seek out others who have different capabilities than our own, and whose support we will need to achieve the goal we see in front of us.  For more on procrastination as a useful management tool, please continue reading below.

“If you procrastinate when faced with a big difficult problem . . .  break the problem into parts, and handle one part at a time.”      ~ Robert Collier

Dan Sullivan and Robert Collier view procrastination in much the same way.  Collier would have us break knotty problems down into smaller parts to be solved one at a time.  Sullivan would also have us break tough problems down into smaller parts, but would then decide which parts he should handle and which parts should be delegated to others.

In his publication, “WhoNotHow,” Sullivan says when we procrastinate in the face of a daunting task, our instinct is to ask ourselves, “How in the world am I going to get this done.”  The better question he says is, “Who can I call on to get this done for me.”  So in Sullivan’s view, the entrepreneur should be focused on who has the right skills, aptitudes, and capabilities to get the job done . . . and leave the how up to them.

When an entrepreneur opens a business, there is no large workforce to help get stuff done.  There is only the entrepreneur and maybe one or two others.  Necessarily then, the entrepreneur wears most, if not all, the hats.  But if the business is successful and flourishes, the entrepreneur will be faced with a decision.  “Do I continue to wear all the hats?  If I do, since I’ve reached the physical limit of what one person can handle, the business will stall and will never grow any bigger than it is right now.”  Hopefully, the entrepreneur chooses the other course whereby he or she begins turning over some of the hats to others who are better qualified to wear those hats than the entrepreneur is.

Gino Wickman is the author of “Traction,” and the creator of the Entrepreneurial Operating System (EOS).  He offers some help for the entrepreneur who recognizes the need to delegate some of his or her hats to others . . . that is, selecting the right “who” for a given task.  He suggests we ask ourselves three questions about the “who” we want to select.  Does the candidate:

  1. Get it?  That is, does he or she truly understand the role being offered, the systems in place to do the job, and the company culture in which the job will have to be carried out?
  2. Want it?  In other words, is the candidate genuinely excited about the opportunity being offered and like the challenge of the work that will be required?
  3. Have the capacity?  Does the candidate have the time, intellect, skill, knowledge, and emotional IQ to do it?

Wickman also advocates an organizational structure whereby there is a “Visionary” at the top who is a big picture person and who can see where the company needs to go, but doesn’t have the planning capability to lay out the strategies and tactics necessary to achieve his or her vision.  Immediately below the Visionary is the Integrator who doesn’t have the Visionary’s gift for seeing the company’s future, but does have the planning and organizational skills needed to move the company toward that future.  We might liken the Visionary to the company’s CEO, and the Integrator to the company’s Chief Operating Officer.

So, when an entrepreneur reaches the limit of his or her capabilities and is locked into a cycle of procrastination, Wickman’s EOS provides an escape in the form of an Integrator who has the capabilities the entrepreneur lacks.

The trick here is getting the entrepreneur to realize that he or she can’t wear all the hats forever.  Sooner or later (preferably sooner), the entrepreneur needs to stop worrying about how to get stuff done and start worrying about who will get stuff done.  That’s what team-building is all about.  But if the entrepreneur fails to build an effective team, it’s unlikely that the company will grow to be anything more than a “lifestyle company” for the entrepreneur.  On the other hand, if the entrepreneur is able to assemble the right team, the path will be open to build a company that can be as large and successful as the market will allow.

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn

“Empathy is about standing in someone else’s shoes, feeling with his or her heart, seeing with his or her eyes.”

According to Wikipedia, “emotional intelligence (EI),  is the capability of individuals to recognize their own emotions and those of others, discern between different feelings and label them appropriately, use emotional information to guide thinking and behavior, and manage and/or adjust emotions to adapt to environments or achieve one’s goal(s).”  Science journalist David Colemen, who popularized the term “emotional intelligence,” indicates that EI accounts for “67% of the abilities deemed necessary for superior performance in leaders, and mattered twice as much as technical expertise or IQ.”  So EI is twice as important to leadership as IQ?  Wow!

A subset of EI is empathy which, again according to Wikipedia, “relates to an individual connecting their personal experiences with those of others.”  Simply stated, empathy is the ability to sense, and relate to, what others are feeling. But why is this important?  Why does EI in general and empathy in particular matter in business today?  Why does entrepreneur Daniel Lubetsky say, “Empathy is one of our greatest tools of business that is most underused.”  For more on this, particularly if you suspect you may be empathy deficient, please continue reading below.

“Empathy is about standing in someone else’s shoes, feeling with his or her heart, seeing with his or her eyes.”    ~ Dan Pink

Business today is all about performance.  Either perform or you’re out.  It doesn’t matter that you’ve been a top performer for the last 10 years.  All that matters is how well you’re performing today . . . that is, if you’re working for a company that is devoid of empathy.  If, on the other hand, you’re working for a company that values and practices empathy, you’ll probably get a visit from your boss (or maybe even your boss’s boss) to find out what’s going on with you.  He or she may say something like, “You’ve been a superstar around here since your first day on the job, but suddenly you seem distracted and disinterested.  You don’t seem to care about your work anymore, and that’s so out of character for you.  Are you OK?  We’re worried about you.  Is there something going on we should know about?”  Maybe the employee is trying to deal with marital issues or problems stemming from drugs or alcohol.  Maybe the employee is worried about a sick child or about an unexpected financial setback or whatever. But if there is a problem that’s getting in the way of the employee’s performance, you’re not going to find out about it unless you ask.

“Are you nuts?” you’re saying to yourself.  “I’m a busy CEO . . . too busy to spend my time going around and holding the hands of everybody who feels a little out of sorts.”  OK, we get that.  But if you’ve got someone who has a stellar track record, doesn’t it make more sense to try to salvage that person than to replace him or her.  Finding a replacement is time-consuming and expensive.  It causes a drop in productivity while the replacement learns the job and gets up to speed.  And there’s no guarantee that you’ll end up with someone who will perform at the level of the person they’re replacing.  No, it makes a lot more sense to see if the company can do something to return the current employee to the glory days when he or she was a top performer.

The U.S. Marines are famously, and fiercely, loyal to one another.  In fact, it’s part of their creed that they never leave a comrade on the field of battle.  Every Marine has the comfort of knowing that his fellow Marines will always guard her back.  Very few organizations can match that level of tribal unity, so maybe those of us in business should learn a lesson from the Marines. After all, isn’t writing off an otherwise good employee who is suddenly experiencing performance issues akin to leaving a comrade on the battlefield?

Obviously, every business needs to hold its employees accountable to certain performance or productivity standards.  If we don’t, we’re not going to be in business very long.  But still, maybe we’re too quick to send someone packing only because their numbers have been off recently.  Instead, guided by EI and empathy, shouldn’t we give an employee the benefit of the doubt and look a little deeper to see if there may be something going on that would explain the employee’s performance problems.  When we do that, a number of good things happen:

  • Obviously, we salvage a good employee and avoid the problems associated with finding and training a replacement.
  • The employee will feel an emotional connection to the company . . . an organization that went out of its way to be helpful when the employee was struggling with some tough life issues.
  • Other employees, watching this drama unfold, will see the company as a caring place that came to the aid of one of their own, and not just a bunch of beady-eyed number crunchers

So with the help of EI and empathy, we can add a human element to the company’s culture which will help build emotional connections between the company and its workforce, while simultaneously maintaining productivity at high levels and employee turnover at low levels.  All and all, that’s a pretty good deal.

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn

Unpatriotic? Go back where you came from? Huh?

This is supposed to be a blog for small business owners and operators, right?  So normally, we steer clear of political topics, but we believe some current political events have parallels in the business world.  Be patient, stay tuned, and we’ll eventually get to the business point of this.

Unless you’ve been in a coma for the last few weeks, you’ve probably seen all the news coverage of the spat between President Trump and four congresswomen of color.  The spat, in general, is over the left-of-center views espoused by these four women, and in particular, over Trump’s use of ICE and Homeland Security.  Trump has declared these women “unpatriotic” and has suggested that they should go back where they came from (even though they’re all American citizens).

Unpatriotic?  Go back where you came from?  It’s reminiscent of the Vietnam War years when “America: Love It or Leave It” was everywhere on bumper stickers and tee shirts.  Why is honest dissent or disagreement suddenly “unpatriotic?”  Does that mean to be a patriot, you have to agree with whoever happens to be in power at the time?  In the 1995 movie, “The American President,” President Andrew Shepherd (played by actor Michael Douglas) gave a speech that is instructive here.  In it he said, “America isn’t easy.  America is advanced citizenship.  You’ve got to want it bad, because it’s going to put up a fight.  It’s going to say, ‘You want free speech?  Let’s see you acknowledge a man whose words make your blood boil and who is standing center stage and advocating at the top of his lungs that which you would spend a lifetime opposing at the top of yours.’”  So free speech is enshrined in our Constitution, and yet those who dare to use it to express an opposing view are labeled “unpatriotic.”  Go figure.

But we promised a business connection to all of this.   To learn the nature of that connection, please continue reading below.

Unpatriotic?  Go back where you came from?  Huh?

Of course, American businesses are not democracies.  Business owners and leaders are not required to put every decision to a vote.  Yet there is probably trouble ahead for business owners and leaders who cling to a hierarchical organizational structure wherein the BOSS makes all the important decisions and tells others in the organization, “If you don’t like the way I’m running things, maybe you should go someplace else.”  Business owners will frequently defend their right to make unilateral decisions about the business citing the financial risks they have taken to get the business started.  And it’s true.  Business owners often have to take extraordinary financial risks to get where they are.  Yet they forget that their employees have also taken significant financial risks . . . i.e., they have tied their future to that of the company, and have entrusted the company to provide financial security for themselves and their families.  So shouldn’t they have a voice in decisions that could impact that financial security . . . not a vote, but a voice?  We believe they should, and here’s why.

  • Is it possible that a blue-collar guy from the shop floor, if asked, might come up with an idea or opinion or concern that top management had not considered?  Absolutely.
  • Is it possible, having been invited to share his ideas, opinions, or concerns, that this blue-collar guy from the shop floor will feel validated as a valued member of the company?  Absolutely.
  • Is it possible that even if his thoughts are not incorporated into the final decision, our blue-collar guy from the shop floor will feel that he had a fair hearing and will therefore support the final decision?  Absolutely.

Unfortunately, some owners are mired in the past and enamored of their ability to throw down lightening bolts.  These owners, like their political counterparts, are likely to say, “If people don’t like working here, they should go someplace else.”  But here’s the downside to that point of view.

  • In this day and age of full employment, if employees feel under appreciated and disrespected, they will go someplace else.
  • In this day and age of full employment, where will the company find quality candidates to fill the jobs left open by those who decided to go someplace else.
  • If employees feel shut out of the company’s decision-making processes, they could seek collective bargaining as a way to gain some level of control over their financial security.  Unions have formed for causes less than that.

The idea of “let ‘em go someplace else” is a stupid way to handle dissent, either in the political realm or in the business world.  And again, we’re not talking about democratizing business.  Final decisions will still be made by upper management . . . but only after others have had a chance to be heard.  Yes, when we invite a larger pool of people into our decision-making process, decisions take more time, and the process can get more complicated, even messy.  But that’s a small downside when compared to the upside of a more inclusive corporate culture.

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn

“Much of what we call management today consists of making it difficult for people to work.”

Gary Hamel is a management expert and author who talks extensively about the need to update our management systems.  He points out that most of the management systems in place today were “invented” over a hundred years ago at the dawn of the industrial revolution when 90% of the population was still involved in agriculture and the average manufacturing company employed fewer than four people.  But as that began to change . . . as factories became larger and as mass production came into play . . . we needed a way to organize untrained farmers and craftsmen into efficient, effective, and productive teams.  Hence, management systems were born to handle the new demands of the Industrial Age . . . to make our output consistent and predictable.  But between those early management beginnings and now, the world has changed.  We now have a highly educated workforce and technologies at our disposal that those early management pioneers could not have even imagined.  Yet we’re still using the same management systems and concepts that were developed over 100 years ago.  Hamel urges us to look at how we’re managing people with an eye toward bringing our management systems into line with the realities of the 21st century.  For more on this, please continue reading below.

“Much of what we call management today consists of making it difficult for people to work.”     ~ Peter Drucker

Many of the things that distinguish modern business from its predecessors are so-called “modern miracles” . . . the internet, computers, air travel, television, and the like.  But an even bigger difference is in the workforce we have today vs. the workforce of the 1890s.  Back then, illiteracy was a significant problem.  As recently as 1940, less than half of Americans over the age of 25 held high school diplomas. Today, 90% of the over 25 age group hold high school diplomas.  Yet the way we manage people today is more consistent with an illiterate workforce than a highly educated one.  Our people still need effective leaders, but they don’t necessarily need to be managed as much as they once did.

If you want to preside over a management system that’s appropriate for the workforce of the 21st century, here are some management practices you should consider adopting:

  • Richard Teerlink, a former CEO of Harley-Davidson, once said, “People don’t come to work every day to do a bad job.” If you don’t believe that, you should stop reading here and be satisfied with an 1890s management system.  But if you do believe it, then everyone in the company should be accorded the dignity and respect befitting people who genuinely want to do what’s expected of them.
  • Do not permit micromanaging . . . not by you and not by anyone else in authority. It’s demeaning and it says in the loudest possible terms, “I don’t trust you to do things right unless I’m right on top of you to make sure.”  Hire good people, give them the training and tools they need to do their work, then get out of their way and let them do it.
  • As a manager, don’t be a cop on a beat, patrolling your area of responsibility and keeping an eye out for someone who might be doing something wrong. Instead, be a coach and mentor to those in your care.  Help them to be successful.  If necessary, defend them against other authority figures within the organization.  When people feel like they have to keep watch over their shoulder to be vigilant for approaching threats or dangers, their attention is divided and they can’t be as effective in their work as they might otherwise be.  But if they know you have their backs, they can feel safe and secure and can devote their full attention to meeting the needs of customers.
  • Help employees achieve the work/life balance they want. Treat them as adults who are entirely capable of managing their own time.  If an employee wants to take some time off to watch a child compete in an athletic event or perform in a school play, as long as the employee’s work is done on time and as long as the employee’s absence doesn’t interfere with anyone else completing their work on time, then why shouldn’t he or she be allowed a little personal time off?
  • Treat employees as trusted colleagues by asking them to participate in the company’s problem-solving and decision-making processes. It’s particularly important to get input from employees whose jobs may be impacted by a decision being considered or by a solution about to be implemented.  Employees who are doing the work everyday know a lot about that work.  They know what they struggle with and what they don’t.  They know where the opportunities are.  Their knowledge and experience, their opinions and ideas are valuable resources that should not go to waste.

Here’s the thing.  People adapt to the environment they’re placed in.  If you treat them as if they’re ignorant, untrustworthy, and incapable of creative thought, then that’s probably the way they’re going to behave.  They won’t show any initiative or try anything innovative.  They will do what their managers tell them to do when their managers tell them to do it, but no more than that.  Their objective will be to get through the day and then go home without getting into too much trouble.

On the other hand, if you treat people with the dignity and respect that is their due, if you recognize that they are bright creative people and have more to offer than just their hands and their backs, and if you invite them to fully participate in the company, its mission, vision, and values, you’ll get something entirely different.  You’ll get a workforce that will go the extra mile for you and that will enthusiastically support the company’s objectives.

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn

“Employee Engagement may have been optional in the past, but it’s pretty much the whole game today.”

Fully 70% of American workers are not “engaged” with their company’s mission, vision, values, and purpose.  They will give their company sufficient effort to stay out of trouble and to continue collecting a paycheck, but that’s about it . . . they’re not going to give their company much, if any, discretionary effort.  Dan Pink, a favorite business writer and speaker of ours, talks a lot about employee engagement, but he comes at it from the standpoint of motivation.  In other words, he talks about those factors that motivate employees to be engaged with their company’s mission, and dedicated to its success.  To learn about the three primary motivators that Pink says lead to engagement, please continue reading below.

“Employee Engagement may have been optional in the past, but it’s pretty much the whole game today.”   ~ Gary Hamel, business speaker, author, and consultant

Most of today’s management practices can be traced to the Industrial Revolution when the country was transitioning from an agrarian society to an industrialized one.  The objective of those practices was to take folks coming off the farm and organizing them into productive work units so they would do what we wanted done, how we wanted it done, and when we wanted it done.  In short, these management practices were (and are) aimed at compliance . . . and that was fine as long as the work being done was relatively simple, short-term, and repetitive.  But as our work has evolved into tasks that are more complex, creative, and that unfold over a longer period of time, compliance has become less important while engagement has become more important.

According to Pink, the three primary motivators that lead employees toward engagement are:

  1. Autonomy
  2. Purpose
  3. Mastery

We’ll start with Autonomy and spend most of our time talking about it, not because it’s more important than the other two, but because it requires a bit more explanation.

Autonomy (self-direction)

People crave a level of control over:

  • their time. They want flexibility over how they schedule their work time vs. their personal time.  But they also want some discretion over how they spend their work time.
  • Human beings arrive from the factory pre-wired to figure stuff out for ourselves and to do things “our way.”  If you doubt that, just try to help, guide, or otherwise direct a toddler.  You’ll get an almost instantaneous, “No!  I want to do it myself.”  To the greatest extent possible, tell people the outcome you’re looking for, but let them achieve it “their way.”
  • Your people would like to have something to say about who they work with.  They don’t want to be arbitrarily thrown in with a bunch of people based on someone else’s whim.
  • People want some control over the tasks they’re expected to carry out so they can work on things that make the best use of their talents . . . that allow them to do the things they do best.

If you believe people are fundamentally untrustworthy, lazy, and prone to take shortcuts, you’ll have a difficult time granting them the level of autonomy that would put them on the path toward genuine engagement.  But if you believe otherwise, then you should hire good people, pay them fairly, allow them as much self-direction as you possibly can, and then get out of their way.

Purpose

People need to know that what they’re doing is important . . . that their work matters, not only to the outside world, but also to the company and to their fellow employees.  From time to time, everyone may wonder, “If I don’t show up for work tomorrow, will anyone notice or care?”  No employee should have to seriously dwell on that thought . . . and with regular feedback and proper reinforcement, they won’t.

Mastery

When people believe that their work is important and that it matters, they will continuously look for ways to gain mastery over it.  They’ll not only look for new skills to add to their arsenal, but they’ll also look for ways to get better at the things they’re already good at.  When the company positions itself as a place of learning and encourages everyone to pursue mastery over whatever they do, employees will see that as a sign that the company cares about them as individuals and is willing to invest in their professional development.

In summary, if you want a workforce that enthusiastically contributes discretionary effort in support of the company’s mission and goals, Dan Pink offers a pretty good roadmap for how to do it:

  • Give your people as much autonomy as possible.
  • Constantly look for ways to reinforce the notion that everyone’s work is important and has value.
  • Offer the company’s support as people seek mastery over their craft.

Do those things and employee engagement will be inevitable.

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn